Afghanistan: the graveyard of empires


On February 17 and 18, the defense ministers of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) held a virtual conference

One of the key items on the table was to assess the current situation of Afghanistan

The Nato defense ministers had to decide whether or not to leave Afghanistan by May 1 as part of the US-Taliban February 29 deal

“Defense ministers had a thorough discussion on the situation in Afghanistan

We are faced with many dilemmas and there are no easy options

At this stage we have made no final decision on the future of our presence,” Nato Secretary General Jens Stolenberg told a news conference after the two-day meeting

The reason the US and Nato forces are facing a dilemma is that they don’t have a clear exit strategy

If they don’t withdraw by May 1, as the US had agreed with the Taliban, the foreign forces risk being attacked by the insurgents

If they withdraw by this summer without any political agreement among the different Afghan groups, the gains of the past 19 years may be undone

The Biden administration is still undertaking a review of the peace deal and that is perhaps the main reason that Nato could not take a final call on their presence in Afghanistan

Since the new administration took charge in the US, a number of officials made it clear that the US troops’ withdrawal is dependent on the Taliban implementing the Doha Accord

The US feels that the Taliban have failed to take steps agreed in the Doha deal

The key element was the reduction in violence and cutting ties with terrorist groups

Both the US and Nato believe that the Afghan Taliban have yet to fulfil those two promises fully

They have since been insisting that the troops’ withdrawal is condition-based

The Taliban, meanwhile, put out a series of statements recently, giving both reconciliatory as well as threatening messages

The insurgent group has denied it violated the Doha Accord

It has listed a number of steps it took to implement the agreement

To back up their claims, the Taliban insist not a single American soldier was killed since the deal was signed

Instead, they accused the Afghan government of violating the peace accord

The most important message the Taliban conveyed in their statements include the possible restart of the attacks against the US-led foreign forces in Afghanistan if they extend their stay beyond the May 1 deadline

The US and other international forces were reminded of the fate the former Soviet Union forces met in the past

The developing situation suggests that the US-Taliban deal, which was dubbed as historic when it was signed a year ago, is on the verge of collapse

This is not an encouraging sign for Pakistan, a key stakeholder that facilitated and brokered the peace deal as well as the intra-Afghan dialogue

The US is likely to come with a new “wish list” for Pakistan once it is done reviewing the Doha Accord

The readout of the latest telephone call between President Ashraf Ghani and the US Secretary of State suggests that the US wants visible reduction in violence, if not an all-out ceasefire, before it commits to the drawdown plan

This may put added pressure on Pakistan, which would be asked to push the Taliban to reduce violence

Islamabad, meanwhile, is consulting other regional players

The recent visit of Russian special envoy in Afghanistan to Islamabad was seen as significant

Russia, unlike the US and Nato, thinks that the Taliban are fully implementing the agreement

Moscow has rather accused the other side of not adhering to the deal

This shows the situation is getting even murkier with regional players looking at US intentions with suspicion

Against this backdrop, the odds are not in favour of peace returning to Afghanistan in the near future

  Published in The Express Tribune, February 22nd, 2021

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces

 



Date:23-Feb-2021 Reference:View Original Link