SYDNEY: Australia is preparing to ban Huawei Technologies Co Ltd from supplying equipment for its planned 5G broadband network after its intelligence agencies raised concerns that Beijing could force the Chinese telco to hand over sensitive data, two sources said.
Huawei, the world’s largest maker of telecommunications network gear and the No 3 smartphone supplier, has promised that Canberra will have complete oversight of 5G network equipment, which could include base stations, towers and radio transmission equipment.
That sort of oversight model has been accepted by other countries–notably the UK, where a special laboratory staffed with government intelligence officials reviews all Huawei products.
Other Western countries, including the New Zealand, Canada and Germany, also say they have sufficient safeguards for assuring that Huawei equipment does not contain “back doors” or other mechanisms for secretly monitoring or collecting information.
But Australian intelligence agencies have told lawmakers that oversight will not allay their concerns, two political sources who have been briefed on the matter told Reuters.
“It is a Chinese company, and under Communist law they have to work for their intelligence agencies if requested,” said one of the government sources. “There aren’t many other companies around the world that have their own political committees.”
Both sources declined to be identified because they were not authorised to speak to the media. Huawei has already been mostly shut out of the giant US market over national security concerns. Its business serving small, rural telecom operators is now at risk after new attacks on the company in recent weeks by some US lawmakers.
Chinese law requires organisations and citizens to support, assist and cooperate with intelligence work. Huawei Australia’s chairperson, John Lord, said that law does not apply to its operations outside of China.
“That law has no legitimacy outside of China,” Lord said. “Within that country, any information coming through us and any equipment we put into their national infrastructure is safe to the best of our ability, and it’s secure.”
That makes it crucial to keep the network secure. Turnbull in February received briefings from the US National Security Agency and Department of Homeland Security on the threat from Huawei, one source familiar with the meeting told Reuters.
“The UK and New Zealand, they have decided that the risk of Huawei is worth it for the benefits of the network. For the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and the US, it is not worth the risk,” a second political source said.
Australia- China Tensions
Although Australia’s intelligence agencies are unwavering in their advice, Turnbull has yet to formally sign off on the Huawei ban. One of the sources familiar with the process said the government is “in no great rush to confirm the ban.”
“It is going to highlight the anxiety that Australian lawmakers have about the rise of China, and it is not going to do any good for the Australian-China relationship,” said Adam Ni, visiting fellow in the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at the Australian National University.
The warning spurred a backbench lawmaker, who sits on the country’s important parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee, on June 18 to urge Turnbull to reject Huawei, a source familiar with the details of the party-room meeting of the ruling government told Reuters.
Turnbull did not directly address the comment, the source said, leaving his own party uncertain of his leanings. In legislation seen as aimed at China, Australia will soon require lobbyists to declare connections to foreign governments. Canberra has also called for increased international aid to the Pacific to counter what it says is Beijing’s attempt to exert greater influence. ($1 = 1.3398 Australian dollars)
The product has already won the Best Consumer Product Design Award 2018
The man claims he was upset that his wife was ignoring him, their children and her duties as a mother and wife